[ome-users] BFail.ndpi solved in Bio-Formats 6.0.1?

[Kölble, Konrad]

Hi All,
does 6.0.1 include the NDPI issue fix I have been moaning about (though not ONLY publicly) since last October?

Cheers
Konrad

Von: Confocal Microscopy List [CONFOCALMICROSCOPY at LISTS.UMN.EDU]" im Auftrag von "David Gault (Staff) [d.gault at DUNDEE.AC.UK]
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 14. März 2019 16:44
An: CONFOCALMICROSCOPY at LISTS.UMN.EDU
Betreff: Release of Bio-Formats 6.0.1
...
File format fixes and improvements:
...
  *   Hamamatsu ndpi
     *   improved handling of variants where a constituent NDPI has no wavelength
...
  *   TIFF
     *   improved handling of direct tile copying to prevent invalid images
     *   improved handling of tiles in scenarios of an invalid offset or byte count of 0
...

________________________________________
Von: ome-users [ome-users-bounces at lists.openmicroscopy.org.uk]" im Auftrag von "David Gault (Staff) [d.gault at dundee.ac.uk]
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Oktober 2018 12:06
An: OME User Support List
Betreff: Re: [ome-users] Insight uploaded BF *.ndpi fails to render in

Hi Konrad,

Thank you for reporting this bug and providing a sample file to test.
I was able to reproduce the issue and it was being caused by a bug in the Bio-Formats reader.
I have opened a PR to fix the issue which will be reviewed and tested for inclusion in a future release: https://github.com/openmicroscopy/bioformats/pull/3248

With Thanks,
David Gault

> On 16 Oct 2018, at 12:53, Kölble, Konrad <Konrad.Koelble at uk-erlangen.de> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> recently about 10% of our brightfield *.ndpi uploads using OMERO.insight-5.4.1-ice36-b75-win
> fail to render in OMERO.web 5.4.6-ice36-b87. You'll find a 2.6GB
> 06-T05322_1A_HEc.ndpi
> as an example of such a fail2show under https://volafile.org/r/pmbwqedm
>
> Cheers
> Konrad
> _______________________________________________
> ome-users mailing list
> ome-users at lists.openmicroscopy.org.uk
> http://lists.openmicroscopy.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/ome-users