[ome-devel] Scanr patch

Melissa Linkert melissa at glencoesoftware.com
Thu Sep 16 22:58:13 BST 2010


Hi Rubén,

Applying this patch is not a problem, but I just want to verify that the
format of the Image names is correct.

In a previous thread, you had asked to have the spot number included in
the Image name (as is currently being done).  See:

http://lists.openmicroscopy.org.uk/pipermail/ome-devel/2009-December/001536.html
http://lists.openmicroscopy.org.uk/pipermail/ome-devel/2009-December/001538.html

Are you sure that the spot number should be removed from the Image name?

Regards,
-Melissa

On Thu, Sep 16, 2010 at 09:47:45AM +0200, Rubén Muñoz wrote:
> Hi Melissa, 
> 
> After using the ScanR importer with some non-captured wells, I realized that the names were incorrect.
> I did the following patch to fix the problem. 
> 
> This is not preventing the converter to create more metadata and images than actually needed, but is already a help.
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> Rubén
> 
> 337a338,339
> >     String [] names = new String [nWells * nPos];
> > 
> 361a364
> >                   names[realPosCount] = "Well " + (well + 1) + ", Field " + (pos +1);
> 468,470c471
> <       String name = "Well " + (well + 1) + ", Field " + (field +1) + " (Spot " +
> <         (i + 1) + ")";
> <       store.setImageName(name, i);
> ---
> >       store.setImageName(names[i], i);


More information about the ome-devel mailing list