[ome-devel] Comparison of Hibernate and Ruby Rails

[Chris Allan]

On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 11:53:59AM +0100, Chris Allan wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 10:32:14AM +0100, Chris Allan wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 05:14:03PM -0500, Josiah Johnston wrote:
> > > When looking something up for Curtis, I ran into an article comparing 
> > > Hibernate and Ruby Rails.
> > > 	http://www.theserverside.com/articles/article.tss?l=RailsHibernate
> > > Ruby Rails offers similar services to Hibernate, but has a different 
> > > architecture and is written in a different language. Our mapping layer, 
> > > DBObject, has many parallels with Ruby Rails.
> > 
> > For those outside of Dundee, whom I've shown Ruby and Ruby on Rails to
> > a few times now, ONLamp has a pretty good article showing off what can
> > be done with Ruby and Ruby on Rails:
> > 
> > http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2005/01/20/rails.html?page=1
> 
> And more recently:
> 
> http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2005/03/03/rails.html
> 
> Along with Amy Hoy's Slash7 trackback:
> 
> http://www.slash7.com/flashback/2005/01/oreilly_onlamp.html

And even more recently:

http://developers.slashdot.org/developers/05/04/04/1520227.shtml?tid=156&tid=1

More fuel for the J2EE vs. RoR flamewars that have been very active of
late. :)

> 
> > 
> > > 
> > > I'm not proposing that we consider to Ruby Rails as a data store. I'm 
> > > tossing this article out because it provides a baseline from which to 
> > > evaluate Hibernate performance and capabilities. This article also 
> > > helped me gain a better understanding of Hibernate and issues relating 
> > > to ORM without a whole lot of reading.
> > > 
> > > The author, surprisingly, hails from Bethesda.
> > > 
> > > -josiah
> > 
> > Ciao.
> > 
> > -Chris
> 
> Ciao.
> 
> -Chris

Ciao.

-Chris