[ome-devel] Comparison of Hibernate and Ruby Rails
Chris Allan
callan at blackcat.ca
Sat Apr 2 11:53:59 BST 2005
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 10:32:14AM +0100, Chris Allan wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 01, 2005 at 05:14:03PM -0500, Josiah Johnston wrote:
> > When looking something up for Curtis, I ran into an article comparing
> > Hibernate and Ruby Rails.
> > http://www.theserverside.com/articles/article.tss?l=RailsHibernate
> > Ruby Rails offers similar services to Hibernate, but has a different
> > architecture and is written in a different language. Our mapping layer,
> > DBObject, has many parallels with Ruby Rails.
>
> For those outside of Dundee, whom I've shown Ruby and Ruby on Rails to
> a few times now, ONLamp has a pretty good article showing off what can
> be done with Ruby and Ruby on Rails:
>
> http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2005/01/20/rails.html?page=1
And more recently:
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2005/03/03/rails.html
Along with Amy Hoy's Slash7 trackback:
http://www.slash7.com/flashback/2005/01/oreilly_onlamp.html
>
> >
> > I'm not proposing that we consider to Ruby Rails as a data store. I'm
> > tossing this article out because it provides a baseline from which to
> > evaluate Hibernate performance and capabilities. This article also
> > helped me gain a better understanding of Hibernate and issues relating
> > to ORM without a whole lot of reading.
> >
> > The author, surprisingly, hails from Bethesda.
> >
> > -josiah
>
> Ciao.
>
> -Chris
Ciao.
-Chris
More information about the ome-devel
mailing list