[ome-users] strange (bad?) meta data with bfopen for MetaXpress

Mario Emmenlauer mario at emmenlauer.de
Wed Apr 15 08:53:54 BST 2015


Dear Melissa and all,

I've seen progress reported in your issue tracker for this!
But I could not easily understand if its in a state that would
make sense for me to try? Even if incomplete, I might be able
to aid development by testing the current snapshot on our ~5k
image sets?

If you think it makes sense, can you point out how I fetch the
patch and integrate it in my local GIT? From there on I know my
way...

Thanks for your help, and Cheers,

    Mario



On 26.03.2015 14:34, Mario Emmenlauer wrote:
> 
> Dear Melissa,
> 
> On 25.03.2015 23:13, Melissa Linkert wrote:
>>> correcting my own email from 30min ago:
>>>
>>> I've checked the current trunk for below-mentioned fix, and I think
>>> several values are fine now. There are some exceptions where I'm
>>> uncertain about the value:
>>>   "AbsoluteZ"        = "2096309"
>>>   "CameraChipOffset" = "2096260"
>>>   "Gamma"            = "2096317"
>>>   "PlaneProperty"    = "2097094"
>>>   "StagePosition"    = "2096244"
>>>
>>> To me, these look possibly incorrect (and actually look more like TIFF
>>> offsets than values). Is that possible?
>>
>> That certainly seems likely.  As with the PageNumber issue, we won't
>> have a fix for this in 5.1.0, but a ticket is now open:
>>
>> http://trac.openmicroscopy.org/ome/ticket/12802
> 
> Thanks for the very fast follow-up! I'll follow the ticket!
> 
> Cheers,
> 
>     Mario
> 
> 
> 
> 
>> Regards,
>> -Melissa
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 12:48:12PM +0100, Mario Emmenlauer wrote:
>>>
>>> Dear Bio-Formats developers,
>>>
>>> correcting my own email from 30min ago:
>>>
>>> I've checked the current trunk for below-mentioned fix, and I think
>>> several values are fine now. There are some exceptions where I'm
>>> uncertain about the value:
>>>   "AbsoluteZ"        = "2096309"
>>>   "CameraChipOffset" = "2096260"
>>>   "Gamma"            = "2096317"
>>>   "PlaneProperty"    = "2097094"
>>>   "StagePosition"    = "2096244"
>>>
>>> To me, these look possibly incorrect (and actually look more like TIFF
>>> offsets than values). Is that possible?
>>>
>>> The image I used is the same as before:
>>>    http://data.marssoft.de/b0BCDSL-T070_wD07_s4_z0_t1_cCy5_u001.tif
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>>     Mario
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 22.01.2015 15:44, Mario Emmenlauer wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Melissa,
>>>>
>>>> On 21.01.2015 23:31, Melissa Linkert wrote:
>>>>> Hi Mario,
>>>>>
>>>>>> attached is an image from MetaXpress, where I try to read all
>>>>>> available meta data. However there are some values that seem not
>>>>>> to make sense, can you please help if there is a bug, or if the
>>>>>> values are indeed correct, or possibly if the issue is in Meta-
>>>>>> Xpress that stores weired values? Examples are:
>>>>>>     Channel #0 Laser focus score    8.2890462076516E-310
>>>>>>     Channel #0 Camera Bit Depth     8.289046E-317
>>>>>
>>>>> Thank you for the bug report - this is indeed a bug in Bio-Formats.  We
>>>>> have a fix under review now:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://github.com/openmicroscopy/bioformats/pull/1537
>>>>>
>>>>> I would expect that to be included in the upcoming 5.0.7 and 5.1.0
>>>>> releases.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the very quick fix, its appreciated! I'll wait for the
>>>> 5.0.7 or 5.1.0 releases to check the result.
>>>>
>>>> All the best,
>>>>
>>>>     Mario
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> -Melissa
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 08:52:41PM +0100, Mario Emmenlauer wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear Bio-Formats developers,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> attached is an image from MetaXpress, where I try to read all
>>>>>> available meta data. However there are some values that seem not
>>>>>> to make sense, can you please help if there is a bug, or if the
>>>>>> values are indeed correct, or possibly if the issue is in Meta-
>>>>>> Xpress that stores weired values? Examples are:
>>>>>>     Channel #0 Laser focus score    8.2890462076516E-310
>>>>>>     Channel #0 Camera Bit Depth     8.289046E-317
>>>>>>
>>>>>> These (and some others) seem not to make sense(?) Attached is
>>>>>> also the meta data that I can extract with Bio-Formats from the
>>>>>> latest Fiji, I believe version Bio-Formats 5.0.6.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> All the best,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>      Mario
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>> Mario Emmenlauer BioDataAnalysis             Mobil: +49-(0)151-68108489
>>>>>> Balanstrasse 43                    mailto: mario.emmenlauer * unibas.ch
>>>>>> D-81669 München                          http://www.marioemmenlauer.de/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> Key	Value
>>>>>>  BitsPerPixel	16
>>>>>>  DimensionOrder	XYCZT
>>>>>>  IsInterleaved	false
>>>>>>  IsRGB	false
>>>>>>  LittleEndian	true
>>>>>>  PixelType	uint16
>>>>>>  Series 0 Name
>>>>>>  SizeC	1
>>>>>>  SizeT	1
>>>>>>  SizeX	1392
>>>>>>  SizeY	1040
>>>>>>  SizeZ	1
>>>>>> AbsoluteZ	2096309
>>>>>> AbsoluteZValid	0
>>>>>> AutoScale	1
>>>>>> AutoScaleHiInfo	0/1
>>>>>> AutoScaleLoInfo	0/1
>>>>>> Binning	1 x 1
>>>>>> BitsPerSample	16
>>>>>> CalibrationUnits	ume
>>>>>> Camera Shutter	Always Open
>>>>>> CameraBin	1x1
>>>>>> CameraChipOffset	2096260
>>>>>> Channel #0 Camera Bit Depth	8.289046E-317
>>>>>> Channel #0 ImageXpress Micro Filter Cube	Cy5
>>>>>> Channel #0 ImageXpress Micro Objective	10X S Fluor
>>>>>> Channel #0 ImageXpress Micro Shutter	Open
>>>>>> Channel #0 Laser focus score	8.2890462076516E-310
>>>>>> Channel #0 Lumencor Blue Intensity	8.289046E-317
>>>>>> Channel #0 Lumencor Blue Shutter	Closed
>>>>>> Channel #0 Lumencor Cyan Intensity	8.289046E-317
>>>>>> Channel #0 Lumencor Cyan Shutter	Closed
>>>>>> Channel #0 Lumencor Green/Yellow Intensity	8.289046E-317
>>>>>> Channel #0 Lumencor Green/Yellow Shutter	Closed
>>>>>> Channel #0 Lumencor Red Intensity	8.289046E-317
>>>>>> Channel #0 Lumencor Red Shutter	Closed
>>>>>> Channel #0 Lumencor Teal Intensity	8.289046E-317
>>>>>> Channel #0 Lumencor Teal Shutter	Closed
>>>>>> Channel #0 Lumencor UV Intensity	8.289046E-317
>>>>>> Channel #0 Lumencor UV Shutter	Closed
>>>>>> Channel #0 _IllumSetting_	Cy5
>>>>>> Channel #0 _MagNA_	8.28904606E-316
>>>>>> Channel #0 _MagRI_	8.289046E-317
>>>>>> Channel #0 _MagSetting_	10X S Fluor
>>>>>> Clear Count	2
>>>>>> Clear Mode	CLEAR PRE SEQUENCE
>>>>>> Compression	LZW
>>>>>> DateTime	19/03/2014 12:59:47:667
>>>>>> Digitizer	20 MHz
>>>>>> Exposure	100 ms
>>>>>> FillOrder	Pixels with lower column values are stored in the higher order bits of a byte
>>>>>> Frames to Average	1
>>>>>> Gain	Gain 1 (1x)
>>>>>> Gamma	2096317
>>>>>> ImageLength	1040
>>>>>> ImageWidth	1392
>>>>>> LastSavedTime	19/03/2014 12:59:47:790
>>>>>> Location	/tmp/b0BCDSL-T070_wD07_s4_z0_t1_cCy5_u001.tif
>>>>>> MaxScale	4095
>>>>>> MetaDataPhotometricInterpretation	Monochrome
>>>>>> MinScale	194
>>>>>> Name	Cy5
>>>>>> NewLUT	8
>>>>>> NewSubfileType	0
>>>>>> NumberOfChannels	1
>>>>>> PhotometricInterpretation	BlackIsZero
>>>>>> PlanarConfiguration	Chunky
>>>>>> PlaneProperty	2097094
>>>>>> Predictor	Horizontal differencing
>>>>>> Region	1392 x 1040, offset at (0, 0)
>>>>>> ResolutionUnit	Inch
>>>>>> SamplesPerPixel	1
>>>>>> Shading	Off
>>>>>> Software	MetaMorph 3.1.0.79
>>>>>> Spatial Calibration	on
>>>>>> StagePosition	2096244
>>>>>> StandardLUT	monochrome
>>>>>> Subtract	Off
>>>>>> Temperature	-29.85
>>>>>> ThreshState	off
>>>>>> ThreshStateBlue	64
>>>>>> ThreshStateGreen	128
>>>>>> ThreshStateHi	65535
>>>>>> ThreshStateLo	0
>>>>>> ThreshStateRed	255
>>>>>> Trigger Mode	Normal (TIMED)
>>>>>> Wavelength	692
>>>>>> XCalibration	645/1000
>>>>>> XResolution	72
>>>>>> YCalibration	645/1000
>>>>>> YResolution	72
>>>>>> Zoom	35
>>>>>> grayFit	4
>>>>>> grayMax	-1/1
>>>>>> grayMin	-1/1
>>>>>> grayPointCount	0
>>>>>> grayX	-1/1
>>>>>> grayY	-1/1
>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> ome-users mailing list
>>>>>> ome-users at lists.openmicroscopy.org.uk
>>>>>> http://lists.openmicroscopy.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/ome-users
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> -- 
>>> A: Yes.
>>>> Q: Are you sure?
>>>>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>>>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?
>>>
>>> Mario Emmenlauer BioDataAnalysis             Mobil: +49-(0)151-68108489
>>> Balanstrasse 43                    mailto: mario.emmenlauer * unibas.ch
>>> D-81669 München                          http://www.biodataanalysis.de/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> ome-users mailing list
>>> ome-users at lists.openmicroscopy.org.uk
>>> http://lists.openmicroscopy.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/ome-users
>>
> 

-- 
A: Yes.
> Q: Are you sure?
>> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation.
>>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email?

Mario Emmenlauer BioDataAnalysis             Mobil: +49-(0)151-68108489
Balanstrasse 43                    mailto: mario.emmenlauer * unibas.ch
D-81669 München                          http://www.biodataanalysis.de/



More information about the ome-users mailing list