[ome-users] TEM montage metadata in .dm3 files
Melissa Linkert
melissa at glencoesoftware.com
Tue Apr 8 00:46:55 BST 2014
Hi Nuno,
> I submitted a Gatan file
> http://qa.openmicroscopy.org.uk/qa/feedback/8024/
Thank you for the report.
> acquired in montage mode using a TEM. This file has metadata
> information about the montage size and overlap, as read in FIJI:
>
> root.ImageList.1.ImageTags.Montage.Acquisition.Number of X Steps = 7
> root.ImageList.1.ImageTags.Montage.Acquisition.Number of Y Steps = 8
> root.ImageList.1.ImageTags.Montage.Acquisition.Overlap between
> images (%) = 14.999999
>
> And this is what I get from OME now:
>
> Number of X Steps 8.388608E7
> Number of Y Steps 1.34217728E8
> Overlap between images (%) 14.999999046325684
>
> The number of X and Y steps is clearly wrong; the overlap is 15% and
> there really is no need/point in having that many decimal places.
The step count issue is now ticketed here:
http://trac.openmicroscopy.org.uk/ome/ticket/12182
The overlap value is what is stored in the file; Bio-Formats does not
perform rounding or truncation of decimal values.
> There might be other information in this file that is not included
> in your current data model, but these 3 items are all I need at the
> moment. You're welcome to go through the rest of the metadata and
> add more fields to the model, of course.
Adding the tiling fields to the OME-XML model is ticketed here:
http://trac.openmicroscopy.org.uk/ome/ticket/6250
> I'd like to receive updates on this issue, particularly when a fix
> becomes implemented. At that time, it would be nice to see a code
> example for reading these values.
You have been CC'd on all of the above-mentioned tickets, and so you
will receive an automated email each time one of the tickets changes.
Regards,
-Melissa
On Thu, Apr 03, 2014 at 07:01:48PM +0100, Nuno Goncalo Dias wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I submitted a Gatan file
> http://qa.openmicroscopy.org.uk/qa/feedback/8024/
>
> acquired in montage mode using a TEM. This file has metadata
> information about the montage size and overlap, as read in FIJI:
>
> root.ImageList.1.ImageTags.Montage.Acquisition.Number of X Steps = 7
> root.ImageList.1.ImageTags.Montage.Acquisition.Number of Y Steps = 8
> root.ImageList.1.ImageTags.Montage.Acquisition.Overlap between
> images (%) = 14.999999
>
> And this is what I get from OME now:
>
> Number of X Steps 8.388608E7
> Number of Y Steps 1.34217728E8
> Overlap between images (%) 14.999999046325684
>
> The number of X and Y steps is clearly wrong; the overlap is 15% and
> there really is no need/point in having that many decimal places.
>
> There might be other information in this file that is not included
> in your current data model, but these 3 items are all I need at the
> moment. You're welcome to go through the rest of the metadata and
> add more fields to the model, of course.
>
> I'd like to receive updates on this issue, particularly when a fix
> becomes implemented. At that time, it would be nice to see a code
> example for reading these values.
>
> Thank you,
> Nuno.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ome-users mailing list
> ome-users at lists.openmicroscopy.org.uk
> http://lists.openmicroscopy.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/ome-users
More information about the ome-users
mailing list