[ome-devel] import into Omero server fails

[Peter Schregle]

Andrew,

thank you very much for the information, this is indeed very helpful.

mfg

Peter Schregle
Geschäftsführer



Impuls computergestützte Bildanalyse GmbH
Carl-Benz-Str. 13
82205 Gilching
Germany/European Union

Phone: +49 8105 773640
Mobile: +49 170 4103344
Fax: +49 8105 773642
E-Mail: p.schregle at impuls-imaging.com
www.impuls-imaging.com

Geschäftsführer: Peter Hengel, Peter Schregle
Handelsregister: Amtsgericht München, HRB 110818

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Andrew Patterson [mailto:ajpatterson at lifesci.dundee.ac.uk]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. September 2010 13:07
> An: Peter Schregle
> Cc: ome-devel at lists.openmicroscopy.org.uk; pierre.menard at till-
> photonics.com
> Betreff: Re: [ome-devel] import into Omero server fails
> 
> Hello Peter,
> 
> The validator does the following steps:
> 
> 1. If OME-TIFF extract the OME-XML from the header.
> 2. Examines the OME-XML block and determines the correct schema.
> 3. Validates the OME-XML against that schema reporting any errors, and
then
> checks with the other older/newer schemas too but just "for info".
> 4. Scans the OME-XML and records all object IDs.
> 5. Scans the OME-XML and checks all Refs and Settings objects point to an
ID
> that is present in the file.
> 6. If OME-TIFF examined the TiffData nodes and calculates the number of
TIFF
> frames needed to make the file complete, then check the TIFF structure to
see if
> there are enough frames present in the file. If not the file is still
valid but
> incomplete (normally part of a multi-file OME-TIFF). Groups of files
cannot be
> checked together yet.
> 
> This all is just checking the structure of the data. No attempt is made to
make
> sure the data values make sense.
> 
> Hope this helps,
> 
> Andrew
> 
> 
> On 16 Sep 2010, at 10:27, Peter Schregle wrote:
> >
> > Just one more question that is unclear to me: the validator on the
> > website did say that our files were ok (which indeed seems to be
> > correct). What exactly is the validator doing? Just checking the schema?
Or
> more?