[ome-devel] DB_UPDATE

Ilya Goldberg igg at nih.gov
Thu Jul 7 15:56:09 BST 2005


On Jul 7, 2005, at 10:26 AM, Josh Moore wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Ilya Goldberg wrote:
>
>> And at the same time, did something change recently. I'm now missing 
>> the
>> "path" field on "image_pixels"?? No "version" for the update to Bug.
>>
>>> This was a 2.10 update (we're at 2.16 in this branch, and 2.15 in
>>> 2.4.0).  I don't know where you're at, but you gots to keep up, man.
>
> ?? Is the path field on image_pixels supposed to be there or not? (and
> when naturally). What happened? Both DBs (that with and that without)
> have configuration.db_version = '2.16'.
>
> Here's my process:
>
> Slightly older database from Chris (nightshade) was updated to the
> OME_2_4_1_DB_UPDATES branch and _had_ the field.

Well, that would be a mistake since it was supposed to be dropped in 
2.10.

>
> This week I installed fresh from HEAD. "cvs up -r
> OME_2_4_1_DB_UPDATES"'d and ran "perl install.pl". All the other fields
> (well, at least most) in the previous DB were there. Path was gone.
> Explicame por favor si posible.

Somewhere along the line the 2.9 upgrade script wasn't run on the DB 
you got from Chris.  You have to get Chris to explicame-you.
At any rate, the DB you got from HEAD with the applied branch is 
correct.  No more image_pixels.path.
-I


>
>  -J.
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFCzTuMIwpkR5bKmAsRApQTAJ96mc7qStiDwQs0ozgVTuny7+fcdgCdEjM8
> cTXAYFth6VjNfi0/pVE/6MU=
> =GWbF
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>



More information about the ome-devel mailing list