[ome-users] dm4 imports with um scale instead of nm

Ralph Sperling sperling.ralph at gmail.com
Wed Oct 30 06:50:31 GMT 2013


Hi Melissa,

thanks - I had again a look and it seems the .dm4 files contain a field 
"Units=nm" (in ImageJ: Show Info).
So I guess the importer could read this field out and set the scale unit 
accordingly.
Please let me know if I can help with anything.

Cheers,   Ralph

On 10.10.2013 17:23, Melissa Linkert wrote:
> Hi Ralph,
>
>> thanks for pointing me to this mailing list. I have uploaded the
>> file but had to _rename_ it to from 8.dm4 to 8.dm3 because .dm4
>> files were not enabled for upload.
>>
>> The image opens fine with both .dm4 or .dm3 suffixx. The field of
>> view or physical size is right in terms of the numbers but not the
>> unit. Microns are displayed but it should be nanometers, as it is a
>> TEM image.
>
> Thank you for uploading a sample file.  There is a ticket on our issue
> tracking system to address this (as you may have seen already):
>
> https://trac.openmicroscopy.org.uk/ome/ticket/11509
>
> You will receive an automated email each time that ticket is updated; if
> you prefer not to receive those updates please let us know.
>
> Regards,
> -Melissa
>
> On Thu, Oct 03, 2013 at 11:00:29PM +0200, Ralph Sperling wrote:
>> Hi Melissa,
>>
>> thanks for pointing me to this mailing list. I have uploaded the
>> file but had to _rename_ it to from 8.dm4 to 8.dm3 because .dm4
>> files were not enabled for upload.
>>
>> The image opens fine with both .dm4 or .dm3 suffixx. The field of
>> view or physical size is right in terms of the numbers but not the
>> unit. Microns are displayed but it should be nanometers, as it is a
>> TEM image.
>>
>> Thanks and best regards,
>>
>> Ralph
>>
>> On 01.10.2013 01:01, Melissa Linkert wrote:
>>> Hi Ralph,
>>>
>>> I am CC'ing the ome-users mailing list
>>> (http://www.openmicroscopy.org/site/community/mailing-lists), as that is the
>>> best place to for Bio-Formats questions.
>>>
>>>> I saw your post about importing dm4 files and your kind offer about contacting the developers in regard to issues (http://imagej.1557.x6.nabble.com/DM4-td5004215.html) - here I have one:
>>>> The dm4 import seems to work well, but the displayed scale of the image is um instead of nm, as it should be. The actual numbers are fine.
>>>> Of course I would be happy to provide sample images, or any other information needed.
>>>
>>> Thank you for the bug report, and for offering to send sample files.  If
>>> you could please send one file that demonstrates the problem along with
>>> the expected physical size of the image, that would be very helpful.
>>> Files can be uploaded to:
>>>
>>> http://qa.openmicroscopy.org.uk/qa/upload/
>>>
>>> Note that anything uploaded there is not made publicly available; it
>>> would only be available to OME developers.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> -Melissa
>>>
>>> On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 04:11:39PM -0700, ralphspg at gmail.com wrote:
>>>> Hi Melissa, I saw your post about importing dm4 files and your kind offer about contacting the developers in regard to issues (http://imagej.1557.x6.nabble.com/DM4-td5004215.html) - here I have one:
>>>> The dm4 import seems to work well, but the displayed scale of the image is um instead of nm, as it should be. The actual numbers are fine.
>>>> Of course I would be happy to provide sample images, or any other information needed.
>>>> Cheers,   RAlph
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _____________________________________
>>>> Sent from http://imagej.1557.x6.nabble.com
>>>>



More information about the ome-users mailing list