[ome-users] false positive errors in logs?

Josh Moore josh at glencoesoftware.com
Thu May 12 08:52:21 BST 2016


On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 4:38 PM, Tjelvar Olsson (JIC)
<Tjelvar.Olsson at jic.ac.uk> wrote:
> Dear OME team,

Hi Tjelvar,


> When I run the "./bin/omero diagnositcs" command I get a load of, what I presume to be, false positive hits for errors.
>
> omero at v0600 OMERO.server]$ ./bin/omero admin diagnostics
>
> Log files:  Blitz-0.log                    1.0 MB        errors=17   warnings=2
> Log files:  Processor-0.log                63.0 KB       errors=17   warnings=0

...snip...

> I believe the error messages appear when I start the apache daeamon.
>
> Below are sample lines form the Blitz and Processor log files:
>
> Blitz-0.log:
>
> 2016-05-11 15:26:48,139 INFO  [        ome.services.util.ServiceHandler] (l.Server-5)  Args:    [Error]
>
> Processor-0.log:
>
> 2016-05-11 15:26:48,173 INFO  [                omero.processor.ProcessI] (Dummy-5   ) <proc:2238,rc=1,uuid=77a08124-110f-43e1-b351-ed9db64244c6> : Changed job status fro
> m Running to Error
>
> Are these messages something to worry about?
>
> If not they make it difficult to spot real errors. Would it be possible to improve the diagnostics command not to highlight these false positives?

Thanks for tracking this down! There shouldn't be any problem to
improve this for 5.3.0 --
https://trello.com/c/ecsPd9WE/87-diag-false-positives-on-error


> In the meantime is there some way of making the logging less verbose, for example by only reporting warnings and errors (i.e. excluding INFO messages)?

Logging for the Java (e.g. Blitz) and Python (e.g. Processor) servers
is handled separately, but both are configurable. See
https://www.openmicroscopy.org/site/support/omero5.2/developers/logging.html#java-servers
for more information.


> Kind regards,
> Tjelvar

All the best,
~Josh


More information about the ome-users mailing list