[ome-devel] Release of OMERO 5.2.0

[Christophe TREFOIS]

Hi Mark,

Since we run pSQL 8.4 on CentOS 7, I think I won’t be able to upgrade so quickly…

Now I have first to come up with a complete migration plan on how to upgrade to CentOS 7, or do a new-install without killing everything and having 2 weeks downtime.

Fun times :)

Thank you for the tips on upgrading OMERO itself though,

Kind regards,

—
Christophe

Dr Christophe Trefois, Dipl.-Ing.  
Technical Specialist / Post-Doc

UNIVERSITÉ DU LUXEMBOURG

LUXEMBOURG CENTRE FOR SYSTEMS BIOMEDICINE
Campus Belval | House of Biomedicine  
6, avenue du Swing 
L-4367 Belvaux  
T: +352 46 66 44 6124 
F: +352 46 66 44 6949  
http://www.uni.lu/lcsb

        

----
This message is confidential and may contain privileged information. 
It is intended for the named recipient only. 
If you receive it in error please notify me and permanently delete the original message and any copies. 
----

  

> On 03 Nov 2015, at 17:13, Mark Carroll <m.t.b.carroll at dundee.ac.uk> wrote:
> 
> On 11/03/2015 03:40 PM, Christophe TREFOIS wrote:
>> Is there a recommended upgrade path from 5.0 to 5.2?
> 
> What we have actually tested carefully is upgrade to 5.1, then upgrade
> to 5.2: the safest course is to go to the latest 5.1 (currently 5.1.4),
> start the server briefly to make sure that it seems to be working okay,
> then continue reading into the 5.2 documentation and do that upgrade.
> 
> I'd love to tell you to just glance over
> https://www.openmicroscopy.org/site/support/omero5.1/sysadmins/server-upgrade.html
> for gotchas before moving to the 5.2 instructions, downloading the 5.2
> zip and running sql/psql/OMERO5.1__1/OMERO5.0__0.sql before
> sql/psql/OMERO5.2__0/OMERO5.1__1.sql and starting up the server -- I
> think that would work just fine in this particular case. Do try it if
> you like, but I'd stop short of calling it "recommended" as it's not
> something we test or think about as much, so not something I'd do on a
> valuable production server. I'd absolutely do it in my development
> environment and expect it to work just fine so I /may/ be being
> overcautious, but our users' data is precious. (-: We may choose to
> recommend that abbreviated approach in due course.
> 
> As always, back up first, and read twice before pasting. We hope that
> you find 5.2 a worthwhile improvement over 5.0!
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Mark
> 
> The University of Dundee is a registered Scottish Charity, No: SC015096
> _______________________________________________
> ome-devel mailing list
> ome-devel at lists.openmicroscopy.org.uk
> http://lists.openmicroscopy.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/ome-devel