[ome-devel] bioformats performance over network shares
Gregory Jefferis
jefferis at mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk
Mon Jun 20 20:37:36 BST 2011
On 2011-06-20 18:02, Johannes Schindelin wrote:
> Maybe the random access could be buffered with a configurable window size?
> That could improve performance and be a more general solution..
This seems like a good idea. For comparison I remember a case for a Fiji
plugin I wrote (NrrdReader) that when reading compressed files from
network drives (SMB) adding a fairly small buffer (50k) could result in
a several fold increase in read speed.
Also was curious about the ratio of bulk write speed to OME tiff write
speed in OP (Ruben's) case.
Best,
Greg.
--
Gregory Jefferis, PhD jefferis at mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk
Division of Neurobiology LMB Lab: +44 (0)1223 252943
MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, LMB Office:+44 (0)1223 252944
Hills Road, LMB Fax: +44 (0)1223 402310
Cambridge, CB2 0QH, UK.
http://www2.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/group-leaders/h-to-m/g-jefferis
http://www.neuroscience.cam.ac.uk/directory/profile.php?gsxej2
http://flybrain.stanford.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openmicroscopy.org.uk/pipermail/ome-devel/attachments/20110620/2e262d75/attachment.html>
More information about the ome-devel
mailing list