[ome-devel] Zeiss 710

Rubén Muñoz ruben.munoz at embl.de
Mon Oct 11 20:51:56 BST 2010


Hi Melissa,
Is there a way of excluding the image/pixel list in all the OME.TIF with bfconvert?
For large multi-file sets the metadata is bigger than the pixel values and this prevents us to use OME.TIF in High Throughput Screens. I'd like to help with the Leica Matrix Screener and ZEN importers as much as possible.
Best regards,
Rubén

On Oct 11, 2010, at 8:22 PM, Melissa Linkert <melissa at glencoesoftware.com> wrote:

> Hi Rubén,
> 
>> That's good news. I am amazed by how the project evolves from simpler to more sophisticated needs. Actually bfconvert was designed to convert I guess, but I was trying to transform Leica Matrix Screener multiple OME.TIF to one-big OME.TIF and then enrich the metadata. 
> 
> If possible, I would recommend waiting for this ticket to be closed:
> 
> http://dev.loci.wisc.edu/trac/software/ticket/563
> 
> ...at which point you can just do 'bfconvert leica-matrix-file.ome.tiff output.ome.tiff' without any additional magic.
> 
>> To give dimensionally to a dataset is my goal. Could one edit the metadata with EditTiffComment for that? Would a tool like EditTiffComment that modifies the metadata of many files accordingly be usefull? 
> 
> You could use one of our TIFF comment editing utilities:
> 
> * java loci.formats.tools.TiffComment -edit /path/to/file
> * java loci.formats.tools.EditTiffG /path/to/file
> 
> But please be very, very cautious.  Again, the above ticket really is
> the best solution, so if you can I would recommend either waiting for
> that ticket to be closed or (if you have a lot of free time) helping to implement it.
> 
> Regards,
> -Melissa
> 
> On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 02:46:50PM +0200, Rubén Muñoz wrote:
>> Hi Melissa, 
>> 
>> On Oct 6, 2010, at 1:09 AM, Melissa Linkert wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Rubén,
>>> 
>>>> Therefore tried this with bfconvert, even when appending to existing OME.TIF is not supported yet.
>>> 
>>> Appending to existing OME-TIFF files is, in theory, supported.  However,
>>> the MetadataRetrieve object used by OMETiffWriter must be correctly set
>>> up, which unfortunately will not happen by repeatedly calling
>>> bfconvert.
>> 
>> That's good news. I am amazed by how the project evolves from simpler to more sophisticated needs. Actually bfconvert was designed to convert I guess, but I was trying to transform Leica Matrix Screener multiple OME.TIF to one-big OME.TIF and then enrich the metadata. 
>> 
>>> 
>>>> However wIth the latest revision of bioformats 7034 when I output the bfconvert to the same file consecutively, the file is always getting bigger in size.
>>> 
>>> Yes, I see the same behavior.  It is ticketed here:
>>> 
>>> http://dev.loci.wisc.edu/trac/software/ticket/578
>>> 
>>> And, as usual, you have been CC'd.  I am a bit curious though: why run
>>> bfconvert repeatedly with the same output file?  Are you trying to
>>> convert multiple datasets to a single OME-TIFF file?  If I know the use
>>> case, then maybe there is a work-around until the above ticket is closed.
>> 
>> To give dimensionally to a dataset is my goal. Could one edit the metadata with EditTiffComment for that? Would a tool like EditTiffComment that modifies the metadata of many files accordingly be usefull? 
>> 
>> Another topic, I guess you remember about the Zeiss ZEN software,  multiple positions in the same LSM file are now supported. 
>> I recently found out that it also produces multi-file LSM datasets (without .mdb). I am getting one of these. I wonder how these files now about each other, but could be that they don't.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> 
>> Rubén
>> 
>> 
>> 


More information about the ome-devel mailing list