<html>
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
</head>
<body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space;" class="">
Hi Kai,
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">From debugging the sample files it would appear that there are differences in the metadata between the two filesets.</div>
<div class="">Images acquired in multi-position mode have the positions of the acquisitions are stored as dimension P, and when images are acquired in tile-scan mode the positions of the tiles are stored as dimension M. </div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">The first file which imported as a series of tiles was parsed to read a dimension P of 1 and dimension M of 20.</div>
<div class="">The second file which imported as you expected had a dimension P of 2 and dimension M of 1.</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">It would look as though there has been some minor difference in the acquisition which is resulting in different metadata fields being used. </div>
<div class=""><br class="">
</div>
<div class="">With Thanks,</div>
<div class="">David Gault</div>
<div class=""><br class="">
<div>
<blockquote type="cite" class="">
<div class="">On 27 Jul 2017, at 12:55, Kai Schleicher <<a href="mailto:kai.schleicher@unibas.ch" class="">kai.schleicher@unibas.ch</a>> wrote:</div>
<br class="Apple-interchange-newline">
<div class="">
<div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" class="">
<p class="">Hi,</p>
<p class="">I was approached by one of our users who reported that recently some tile scans recorded at our Zeiss LSM700 inverted confocal
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://demo.openmicroscopy.org/webclient/?show=image-1185" class="">
do not import as "stitched" any more</a>. Other images that where acquired with the exact same settings however
<a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://demo.openmicroscopy.org/webclient/?show=image-1231%7Cimage-1232" class="">
imported fine</a>.</p>
<p class="">I think that the images are not actually stitched, as this option is not available in the version of acquisition software that was used.</p>
<p class="">Opening the files with FIJI/Bio-formats having the "stitch tiles" option checked works well.</p>
<p class="">When you compare the images, do you find a difference that maybe led OMERO to not use the "stitched tiles" option in some cases?</p>
<p class="">You can find all images on your demo server with <a moz-do-not-send="true" href="https://demo.openmicroscopy.org/webclient/?show=dataset-105" class="">
Dataset ID 105</a>.</p>
<p class="">Thanks for your help and greetings from Basel,<br class="">
Kai<br class="">
</p>
<pre class="moz-signature" cols="72">--
>>Please note my NEW PHONE NUMBERS: +41 61 207 57 31 (direct) +41 61 207 22 50 (central)<<
Kai Schleicher, PhD | Research Associate in Advanced Light Microscopy | Biozentrum, University of Basel | Klingelbergstrasse 50/70 | CH-4056 Basel |
Phone: +41 61 207 57 31 (direct) +41 61 207 22 50 (central) | <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:kai.schleicher@unibas.ch">kai.schleicher@unibas.ch</a> | <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.biozentrum.unibas.ch/">www.biozentrum.unibas.ch</a> | <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="http://www.microscopynetwork.unibas.ch/">www.microscopynetwork.unibas.ch</a></pre>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br class="">
ome-users mailing list<br class="">
<a href="mailto:ome-users@lists.openmicroscopy.org.uk" class="">ome-users@lists.openmicroscopy.org.uk</a><br class="">
http://lists.openmicroscopy.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/ome-users<br class="">
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
<br class="">
</div>
<br>
<span style="font-size:10pt;">The University of Dundee is a registered Scottish Charity, No: SC015096</span>
</body>
</html>