<html>
<head>
<style>
.hmmessage P
{
margin:0px;
padding:0px
}
body.hmmessage
{
FONT-SIZE: 10pt;
FONT-FAMILY:Tahoma
}
</style>
</head>
<body class='hmmessage'><div style="text-align: left;">hi,<br><br>Thank you for the info. <br><br>I managed to get the OMERO server setup and had a play with the clients. Looks very nice, but it seems to be missing alot of the functionality of OME.<br><br>So it seems OME is the only real way forward to address the needs of the Lab I am in. We use Matlab quite extensively for our image analysis, so Matlab integration is a requirement.<br><br>I am still not clear to why the Open Microscopy Group has these two projects. So have the following questions I think I should try and understand before I make a decision.<br><br>1) Is OMERO planned to one day substitute OME?<br><br>2) If (1) is true will moving from OME to OMERO be feasable?<br><br>3) If (1) is true again, whats wrong with OME?<br><br>I had a good look around the website but couldnt really find any information regarding this. If anybody could shed some ligth I would greatly appreciate. Maybe I just misunderstood something....<br><br>Regards,<br><br>j.<br></div><br>--------------------------------------<br> <a href="http://www.avondo.com" target="_blank">www.avondo.com</a><br><br><hr id="stopSpelling">> Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2008 09:02:07 +0100<br>> From: mvalle@cscs.ch<br>> To: jeromeavondo@msn.com<br>> CC: ome-users@lists.openmicroscopy.org.uk<br>> Subject: Re: [ome-users] Simple Question, OME or OMERO?<br>> <br>> If I understand correctly,<br>> you still need OME if you need Matlab integration.<br>> Also from what I see from the documentation, OMERO setup is more complex.<br>> Well, right now I'm still fighting with OME to make it work for my researchers.<br>> Hope it helps...<br>> mario<br>> <br>> Jerome Avondo wrote:<br>> > <br>> > Hello,<br>> > <br>> > I am looking at database solutions for microscopy images. The lab I work<br>> > in generates substantial quantities of 3D, 4D datasets with various<br>> > imaging methods.<br>> > <br>> > As I understand currently the Open Microscopy Environment group has two<br>> > solutions on offer;<br>> > <br>> > 1) the older OME system<br>> > 2) or the newer beta OMERO system<br>> > <br>> > It is not clear from your site which is the solution new adopters should<br>> > jump aboard. Is the OMERO beta at a stage that this can be used in the<br>> > real world, or would you recomend sticking with the older non-beta OME<br>> > solution. What are the PROS/CONS of each solution you offer?<br>> > <br>> > If you could point me in the right direction to make this decision I<br>> > would be very greatful.<br>> > <br>> > many thanks & kind regards,<br>> > <br>> > jerome.<br>> > <http://www.avondo.com><br>> > <br>> > <br>> > Sounds like? How many syllables? Guess and win prizes with Search<br>> > Charades! <http://www.searchcharades.com><br>> > <br>> > <br>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------<br>> > <br>> > _______________________________________________<br>> > ome-users mailing list<br>> > ome-users@lists.openmicroscopy.org.uk<br>> > http://lists.openmicroscopy.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/ome-users<br>> <br>> -- <br>> Ing. Mario Valle<br>> Visualization Group | http://www.cscs.ch/~mvalle<br>> Swiss National Supercomputing Centre (CSCS) | Tel: +41 (91) 610.82.60<br>> v. Cantonale Galleria 2, 6928 Manno, Switzerland | Fax: +41 (91) 610.82.82<br><br /><hr />Sounds like? How many syllables? <a href='http://www.searchcharades.com' target='_new'>Guess and win prizes with Search Charades!</a></body>
</html>