<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; "><div>Hi Melissa, </div><div><br></div><div>Regarding the last dataset that I sent. I believe now that it contains indeed, intentionally, 48 series.</div><div>Therefore the importer is detecting the correct values and doing the correct conversion. </div><div><br></div><div><blockquote type="cite"><div><br>Do you have any written documentation that says this? I have been<br>re-reading the LSM specifications and have not found any mention of<br>this. Again, if I look at the pixel data it is quite obvious that that<br>is correct, but if you have any documentation that confirms it that<br>would help.<br><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#000000"><font class="Apple-style-span" color="#006312"><br></font></font></div></blockquote></div><div><br></div><div><div>I have asked the author of these images. She produced the data using a Zeiss macro that actually doesn't perform series, but many different single images, renamed independently.</div><div>I have nothing to add to this thread. It is not an issue. Never mind about that dataset, I am not sure how I will convert them, but bioformats should not do it directly.</div><div><br></div><div>However... Can one add the corresponding independent series to one OME.TIF file creating a new multiT set?</div><div><br></div><div>Thanks for the discussion. </div><div><br></div><div>Rubén</div><div><br></div></div><br></body></html>